About the Project

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 “Our generosity may leave us empty, but our emptiness then pulls gently at the whole until the thing in motion returns to replenish us.” —Lewis Hyde, The Gift

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 The text contained on this site is the draft manuscript of Generous Thinking: The University and the Public Good, which is to be published by Johns Hopkins University Press. As I did with my last book, Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy, I’m seeking feedback through a process of community review. This time out, I’m handling a couple of things differently: I’m staging the review process by first seeking input from a range of specific readers before opening the draft to the world, and the comment period is going to be limited to a period of six weeks. The internet is a bit different than it was in 2009, and while I still believe in working in public (as this manuscript will bear out), I also want to acknowledge and account for the challenges that openness presents in 2018.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 3 Planned Obsolescence explored a number of potential transformations in the ways that scholars work and communicate with one another that were being inspired by the networks through which we are connected; Generous Thinking turns its attention to the ways that scholars might connect and communicate with a range of off-campus communities about our shared interests and concerns, which I believe will be a necessary element of rebuilding the relationship between the university and the public that it is meant to serve.

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 2 That this relationship needs rebuilding seems all too evident as I write, in February 2018, as the news is filled with evidence of spectacular failures: the university has been undermined by the withdrawal of public support for its functions, but that public support has been undermined by the university’s own betrayals of the public trust. My hope is that Generous Thinking might provide one pathway toward renewing that trust. It won’t be easy, but it’s crucial to the future of higher education in the U.S. that we try.

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 4 The first seeds of the idea for this book were planted late in the Obama administration, a time when the call to generosity, to community, to care seemed only natural. Much of it was drafted during the 2016 presidential campaign and its 2017 aftermath, when the same call seemed to take on a kind of desperation. It has been difficult, in several ways, to keep this from becoming a fundamentally angry book, while nonetheless allowing its anger space in amongst its general emotional swirl. Acknowledging those emotions and their often very personal origins is one of the ways in which this book tries to find some common ground with the audience that it seeks to create, an audience that is not just composed of other scholars but also administrators, students, parents, and the many other people who affect and care about the futures of our institutions of higher education. The book also tries, to some extent, to minimize its scholarly apparatus; while I still rely on many voices who have contributed significantly to my thinking about the questions I raise, my goal is to make this text as broadly readable as possible.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 2 I hope that you’ll comment here, letting me know how I’ve done, and where I might do better. I’ll be following the discussion throughout the comment period, asking questions that will help me sort out the revision process ahead.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 Portions of chapter 4 were originally published as “Giving It Away: Sharing and the Future of Scholarly Communication,” in the Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol. 43, no. 4 (2012).

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 Huge thanks are due to Lucretia McCulley, Rob Nelson, Kevin Butterfield, and their many colleagues at the University of Richmond, for inviting me to visit. The talk I gave there in February 2016 turned out to be the first tentative steps toward this project, and their generous reception and engagement with the ideas I presented played an enormous role in its development.

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 1 Thanks are also due to Greg Britton and Catherine Goldstead at Johns Hopkins University Press, and to Nicky Agate, Eric Knappe, Ryan Williams, and Anne Donlon at Humanities Commons, for making this process possible. And finally, thanks as well to Christian Wach for continuing to support and develop CommentPress, on which this project and so much other scholarly conversation relies.

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 —Kathleen Fitzpatrick

Source: https://hcommons.org/

Skip to toolbar